A tenant may move during a fixed-term lease if the lease includes an interruption clause that states that either party may terminate the tenancy prematurely (i.e., before the term expires). If there is no interruption clause in the contract, you can only terminate the rental if both parties agree. This is called the transfer of the rental. The transfer takes place when both parties to a tenancy, the landlord and the tenant, voluntarily agree to terminate the tenancy. Once the remittance has taken place, all obligations and rights arising from a tenancy also end. If an owner wishes to develop properties leased to tenants, he can structure a transfer agreement to terminate the lease upon execution, grant the tenant a license to use the premises on an agreed termination date in accordance with the owner`s development plan, provide for the issuance of an immediate arrest warrant for eviction suspended until the date of termination. and allow the tenant to earn a high redemption payment only if they leave on time on the date of termination, time being crucial. For example, Herrick sat at 154-7th Ave. Chelsea, Inc., v. Ballaghaderreen Corp., 2018 WL 1536626 (Sup. Ct. N.Y.

Cnty. March 29. March 2018) in a lawsuit seeking to enforce the strict terms of a transfer agreement he drafted on behalf of a building owner for a world-class commercial space in Manhattan`s Chelsea neighborhood. In a summary decision, the trial court found that the commercial tenant breached his contractual obligation to release the owner`s main road space in a timely manner, ordered the reimbursement of an undeserved termination fee totalling $1 million, and awarded interest and attorneys` fees to the landlord. The agreement must specify the date and time when the property is officially returned to the owner and in what condition. It should also include all financial conditions required by one or both parties at the time of delivery. Both parties sign the agreement, hand over the keys and the rental ends. According to D`Agostino, landlords may question the benefit of entering into a contract with defaulting tenants if their recovery is limited to the reduced amount provided for in the restructured contract.

As the dissent stated, the majority decision would allow defaulting tenants to default again without recourse. As is apparent from D`Agostino, the question whether a transfer agreement is structured as a settlement under a missed lease or as a voluntary transaction between independent parties may determine the extent of the remedies available in the event of an infringement. A carefully and creatively designed transfer agreement can help parties maximize their remedies if their expectations are not met. In the case of co-owners (i.e., more than one landlord is listed on the lease), you must generally agree with all landlords to end the tenancy prematurely. However, if one co-owner acts as an agent for the other, he or she may accept the waiver on behalf of all landlords. If the co-owners have appointed an agent to act on their behalf and you have been ordered to deal with that agent, you can deal with the agent to end your tenancy prematurely. The Supreme Court and the Appeal Division, First Division, sided with D`Agostino. In a 4-3 decision, a split court of appeal upheld that the punitive nature of the lump-sum damages provision was an unenforceable penalty because it constituted damage disproportionate to Columbia`s actual losses due to the breach of the waiver agreement: ”In all respects, the over -$1 million plus interest charged here is disproportionate to the $175,571.73, that have not been paid under the remission agreement. The restoration of D`Agostino`s future obligations under the terminated lease would require the payment of damages effectively equal to 7 1/2 times what Columbia would have received if D`Agostino had fully complied with the transfer agreement. Specifically, the court ruled that Columbia`s damages for D`Agostino`s breach of the surrender agreement and not D`Agostino`s previous breach of the lease. The court concluded that the transfer agreement constituted a new contract that replaced the lease. .

. .